US Withdrawal from Syria: A Path to Stability, According to Former Ambassador Robert Ford
Former US Ambassador Robert Ford suggests that the US withdraw its military forces from Syria, arguing it would better stabilize the region and allow collaboration with Syria’s new transitional government against ISIS. He emphasizes easing sanctions and supporting public activism for democracy, asserting that the future of Syria lies in its own hands, not American military presence.
Former US Ambassador to Syria Robert Ford advocates for a withdrawal of US military forces from Syria to enhance stability in the region. By collaborating with the newly transitional government in Damascus, Ford believes that the US could leave Syria on favorable terms, as expressed in his article in Foreign Affairs.
Ford asserts that the current US military presence in Syria is precarious, lacking a definitive mission and objectives. He points out that despite American support for the Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF) against ISIS, the terror group continues to be active, indicating a need for a strategic shift in the US approach.
With the Assad regime’s collapse, Ford notes that the US has the opportunity to forge a partnership with the new government in Damascus, which could create a stronger front against ISIS remnants. He calls for a clear message to the SDF regarding the necessity for compromises in security and administrative arrangements, which may involve the gradual dissolution of the SDF.
The SDF, led by the YPG, operates as a branch of the PKK terror organization, which is responsible for significant violence, including the deaths of over 40,000 individuals. Ford emphasizes that easing sanctions on Syria could assist in stabilizing the country and effectively combating ISIS.
According to Ford, fostering public activism alongside the rule of law and personal freedoms is vital for Syria’s path towards genuine democracy, although this process is expected to be slow and complex, ultimately resting upon the Syrians themselves. He insists that this transformation does not necessitate direct American involvement or military presence.
Following the departure of Bashar Assad, who has ruled for nearly 25 years, the Syrian government has initiated a transitional phase with Ahmed al-Sharaa as the newly appointed president. This transition involves the dismantling of the previous regime’s armed factions, security agencies, parliament, and the annulment of the prior constitution.
In summary, Robert Ford proposes that the US should withdraw its military from Syria to partner with the new transitional government for better stability. He emphasizes that without a clear mission, US forces are vulnerable and that easing sanctions and fostering democracy should be the primary focus. Ford believes that the future of Syria should be determined by its people rather than continued foreign military presence. The recent political changes in Syria mark a significant shift that could facilitate this new approach.
Original Source: www.aa.com.tr
