Witkoff: Hamas Rejects Demilitarization, Urgency for Bridging Proposal

Hamas declined multiple opportunities to demilitarize and accept a ceasefire bridging proposal, according to US envoy Witkoff. He asserted Hamas’s role as the aggressor and reiterated US support for Israel. The article also discusses the urgency of the bridging proposal for hostage releases and addresses Iran’s nuclear ambitions and the Ukraine conflict.

US Special Envoy Steve Witkoff stated that Hamas had multiple chances to demilitarize and accept a bridging proposal but chose not to. He emphasized that “Hamas is the aggressor here,” placing responsibility for the ongoing conflict in Gaza squarely on Hamas, while asserting that the United States supports Israel.

Witkoff explained that the group is accountable for the resumption of hostilities after declining what had been termed an “acceptable deal.” He addressed concerns about Iran, declaring that they must not acquire a nuclear weapon, stating emphatically, “It cannot happen, and it will not happen.” He urged for diplomatic discussions between the US and Iran to find a resolution.

Additionally, Witkoff expressed hope regarding the prospect of high-stakes negotiations aimed at resolving the conflict in Ukraine, believing that Russian President Vladimir Putin is seeking peace. The US State Department highlighted an existing “bridge proposal” that could extend a ceasefire in Gaza and facilitate the release of five hostages, including an American citizen, while also freeing numerous Palestinians from Israeli detention.

The urgency of the situation was noted, with the opportunity for this proposal said to be “closing fast.” A spokesperson clarified that the proposal’s acceptance is essential for progress, urging action amid the ongoing crisis.

This article provides insight into the current stance of the United States regarding Hamas and the ongoing conflict in Gaza. Witkoff’s statements underscore Hamas’s rejection of diplomatic overtures and highlight the urgency for a ceasefire bridging proposal. Furthermore, concerns regarding Iran’s nuclear ambitions and the situation in Ukraine were addressed, indicating a comprehensive approach to international diplomacy.

Original Source: www.jpost.com