Deported Women Speak Out: Misleading Policies and Emotional Misery in Immigration Enforcement

On March 15, the Trump administration attempted to deport over 200 men to El Salvador, mistakenly including eight women who were not accepted and returned to the U.S. Heymar Padilla Moyetones and Scarleth Rodriguez share their experiences of being misled about their destination and the chaotic process of their deportation. They emphasize the lack of due process and depict the emotional toll such policies take on families.
On March 15, the Trump administration attempted to deport over 200 men to El Salvador’s notorious CECOT prison, a symbol of the U.S. stance on immigrants with supposed gang ties. Among those on the planes, eight women were left hidden from view, ultimately returned to the United States without ever disembarking in El Salvador. Two of these women, Heymar Padilla Moyetones and Scarleth Rodriguez, shared their chaotic experience during this operation in an interview with NBC News.
Moyetones stated that they had been misled about their destination, initially being told they were headed to Venezuela. Upon arrival, they learned they were actually in El Salvador. U.S. officials claimed that all deportees were vetted Venezuelans with gang connections; however, they evidently overlooked the acceptance of female detainees in El Salvador.
Both women, currently housed in a Texas detention center, asserted their innocence, categorically denying links to the Tren de Aragua gang. They expressed their disillusionment with the U.S. after initially hoping for a better future for themselves and their families. Moyetones, particularly heartbroken, feared for her 2-year-old son, who remains in Venezuela under a relative’s care.
The women’s accounts reveal discrepancies with the administration’s claims regarding the deportation process. Court documents indicate erroneous deportations, including that of Kilmar Abrego Garcia, who was sent to El Salvador despite an existing court order blocking his deportation. Legal expert Lee Gelernt criticized the lack of due process in determining who should be deported to El Salvador, raising concerns about the fairness of the vetting process.
Moyetones and Rodriguez recounted the disorganization leading up to their deportation, including aborted attempts and miscommunication regarding their flights. The process involved confusion, with many women left on a bus while others were boarded for the flight. Ensuring their safety, a public official advised those not boarding to be grateful, stating, “Thank God that you’re not going on that plane.”
During the flight, the women were not informed that they were heading to El Salvador until they disembarked. A stop in Guatemala introduced further confusion, as they were told they were still en route to Venezuela. Upon realizing they were in El Salvador, they witnessed the rough handling of male deportees by Salvadoran officials, deepening their distress with the situation.
Rodriguez’s mother expressed heartbreak upon learning her daughter had not arrived in Venezuela as expected. She illustrated the desperation faced by her family, emphasizing their humble background and the wrong perceptions associated with seeking asylum. Her unwavering support for Rodriguez and hopes for reunification reflect the emotional weight of their plight, casting light on the broader issues surrounding U.S. deportation policies and their human impact.
The experiences of Heymar Padilla Moyetones and Scarleth Rodriguez highlight significant flaws in the Trump administration’s deportation strategy, particularly concerning the treatment of women and the reliance on inadequate vetting processes. Their accounts reveal both the confusion surrounding deportation procedures and the emotional turmoil inflicted on families separated by these policies. As their stories unfold, they raise important questions about due process and humanitarian considerations in immigration enforcement.
Original Source: www.nbcnews.com