Trump Wins Immediate Praise from Republicans in Congress After Announcing Strikes on Iran
President Donald Trump announced U.S. military strikes on three Iranian nuclear sites, receiving swift approval from many Congressional Republicans while facing criticism from some within his party and the Democratic side emphasizing constitutional authority over military decisions.
In a dramatic move, President Donald Trump announced on Saturday evening that U.S. military forces have targeted three nuclear sites in Iran. This decision was met with quick applause from many Republicans in Congress, marking a notable moment in U.S. foreign policy.
Senator Lindsey Graham from South Carolina was quick to express his support on X, declaring, “Well done, President Trump.” Other Republican leaders echoed similar sentiments; Texas Senator John Cornyn referred to it as a “courageous and correct decision,” while Alabama Senator Katie Britt deemed it as “strong and surgical” strikes.
The chairman of the Senate Armed Services Committee, Roger Wicker of Mississippi, pointed out that Trump made a deliberate choice to address the “existential threat posed by the Iranian regime.” He emphasized that the nation now faces serious decisions regarding security for citizens and allies in light of these actions.
Republicans have been cautiously optimistic leading up to the strikes, and Senate Majority Leader John Thune remarked, “As we take action tonight to ensure a nuclear weapon remains out of reach for Iran, I stand with President Trump and pray for the American troops and personnel in harm’s way.”
Thune met with House Speaker Mike Johnson ahead of the military actions, suggesting close coordination among party leaders. Johnson issued a statement indicating that the operations signify a stern warning to adversaries and allies alike: “President Trump means what he says.”
In the House, Intelligence Committee Chairman Rick Crawford expressed his gratitude to U.S. servicemembers on X, acknowledging the precision of the strikes. Meanwhile, Pennsylvania’s Democratic Senator John Fetterman, usually aligned with his party’s views, openly commended the attack, asserting that Iran being the world’s premier sponsor of terrorism necessitates such actions.
However, not all responses aligned with party lines. Kentucky Representative Thomas Massie publicly criticized the strikes, stating, “This is not Constitutional.” This illustrates a divide within the Republican ranks regarding military engagement abroad.
Some Democrats have raised concerns over the lack of congressional oversight, arguing Congress should play a fundamental role in decisions regarding military action. Virginia Senator Tim Kaine’s resolution, expected to be voted on soon, aims to require congressional approval before declaring war or engaging in military actions against Iran.
Connecticut Representative Jim Himes underscored constitutional responsibilities, insisting that Congressional review should precede any military operations. Himes stated, “According to the Constitution we are both sworn to defend, my attention to this matter comes BEFORE bombs fall. Full stop.” The debate within Congress continues to evolve as reactions pour in.
The recent military strikes by the U.S. against Iranian nuclear facilities have sparked immediate and vociferous support from many congressional Republicans, reflecting a solid front on the matter. Yet, divisions remain, with some party members and a number of Democrats advocating for greater congressional authority in military decisions. As discussions about accountability and oversight proceed, the tension between executive action and legislative obligation remains palpable.
Original Source: apnews.com
