Nigerian Armed Robber Avoids Deportation Due to Mental Health Concerns

A Nigerian armed robber has avoided deportation to Nigeria due to serious mental health issues and a belief that he is possessed. Despite being a convicted criminal, the court ruled that he would face inadequate treatment in Nigeria, allowing him to stay in the UK. This case raises important questions about the intersection of human rights laws, public safety, and immigration policy.

A Nigerian man with severe mental health issues, convicted for robbery and crack cocaine dealing, has successfully avoided deportation due to his belief in possession by demons. Jailed for seven years for an armed robbery in 2011 and again for drug offenses, he has spent much of his time institutionalized and continues to be seen as a risk to public safety. His deportation order from 2014 was appealed on human rights grounds, resulting in a ruling that he would face inadequate treatment in Nigeria, where he is likely to be viewed as possessed by evil spirits.

Judge Stephen Smith highlighted that the man’s longstanding belief in demonic possession would likely lead to increased stigma and risk upon return to Nigeria. Reports indicate that he suffers from a trauma-related disorder with psychotic features, including experiences of intrusive memories and nightmares linked to demons. Consequently, he is now back in the community, engaging in treatment but remains a high-risk individual.

The judicial decision to allow him to remain in the UK was influenced by the assessment that domestic treatment guidelines are highly supportive of his condition. The man expressed a desire to avoid returning to a life of crime, stating his wish to lead a normal lifestyle. While he has exhibited positive behavior, like gym attendance and volunteering, concerns persist regarding his mental health and potential public risk.

Migration Watch UK’s chairman, Alp Mehmet, criticized the situation, questioning why the UK should be responsible for addressing the health needs of serious offenders from other countries. This case reflects broader issues surrounding the use of human rights laws to prevent deportations of individuals with criminal backgrounds. The court may conduct another hearing to further assess the implications of this ruling.

The case illustrates complex intersections between criminality, mental health, and immigration laws in the UK. Despite being a serious offender, the individual has been allowed to remain due to health concerns stemming from his belief in demonic possession, highlighting significant challenges in addressing the needs and risks posed by such cases. Furthermore, it raises ongoing debates about the responsibilities of the UK in providing care for foreign nationals with criminal records and severe mental health issues.

Original Source: www.telegraph.co.uk