Syria’s Al Shara Initiates Political Transition with Constitutional Committee
Ahmad Al Shara’s leadership in Syria has triggered a political transition process, with a seven-member committee assigned to draft a constitutional framework. The new administration faces concerns from minority communities regarding potential Islamic rule while responding to international calls for pluralism. Observers suggest that this shift may delay the formation of a new government, emphasizing the need for inclusivity in the political landscape.
Syria’s newly appointed leader, Ahmad Al Shara, has initiated a political transition by establishing a seven-member committee responsible for drafting constitutional principles intended to replace the previous regime. A decree from Mr. Al Shara mandates this committee to create a “constitutional declaration” to regulate the framework of Syria’s transitional phase, although it does not specify the duration of this period.
The newly formed administration, which primarily consists of Mr. Al Shara’s Hayat Tahrir Al Sham (HTS) group, faces external pressure to adopt a more pluralistic approach. Opposition from Kurdish, Druze, and other minority communities stems from concerns over the potential enforcement of strict Islamic governance.
Speculation regarding Mr. Al Shara’s government formation has arisen as the focus shifts to the constitutional committee. Observers believe that the creation of this committee might delay the establishment of a new government. Currently, the cabinet is entirely composed of HTS loyalists, following the removal of Bashar Al Assad on December 8.
Prominent human rights lawyer Radeef Mustafa estimates that the transitional phase might last two years, emphasizing the importance of national principles and freedoms. The committee features a diverse membership, including both men and women, with representatives from prominent law schools in Aleppo and Damascus.
Mr. Al Shara has communicated that the implementation of Islamic tenets should professionalize, advocating for “shura”—a form of collective decision-making within Islam. However, he has expressed caution about adopting foreign governmental systems entirely.
Critics like Ahmad Aba Zeid, an independent Syrian researcher, argue that the decree establishing the committee reflects a lack of broader participation in political decision-making, suggesting that the ruling elite fears the emergence of competing power structures. Including a wider array of voices in governance could be essential in preventing Syria’s disintegration.
Controlling the entire country remains a challenge for the new administration, amid significant foreign powers retaining regional influence. Russia operates a coastal base, aligned with the erstwhile regime, while the US supports Kurdish forces to the east. Israel has asserted its interests in areas like the Golan Heights, especially regarding HTS troop placements in specific territories.
Recently, a national dialogue convened by Al Shara called for armed groups to surrender weapons, threatening those who refuse with outlaw status. Recent clashes in Damascus, particularly involving the Druze community and HTS, highlight ongoing tensions and prompted Israel to reaffirm its commitment to protect Syria’s Druze minority.
Ahmad Al Shara’s appointment represents a crucial shift in Syria’s political landscape, with initial steps towards drafting a new constitution and handling the complexities of a transitional government. The emergence of HTS as a dominant force presents challenges for national unity and pluralism, as various communities express their fears regarding governance. Ultimately, the success of this transition will depend on how effectively the new leadership can navigate internal divisions and external pressures while promoting inclusive governance.
Original Source: www.thenationalnews.com
